IS TOR PORN SAFER FULL

Other parts of the site may not work (menus for example), but if I'm just following a link to an article I want to read and I can read it without javascript why do I care if the menus on the site are broken or if i can't leave a comment?įor the sites I regularly visit that really do need JS I enable only the JS files needed to accomplish the things that I want and that's only necessary to do one time for each site. That means the text I clicked to read is displayed and is readable, the images I clicked to view are displayed, etc. The internet with NoScript is the best way to browse 90% of the time.Įven today, the vast majority of the sites I visit (including the one linked to in this post) work just fine (for what I want) without JS.

I started because it was required for my work and I just got used to it and now do it everywhere. > Anybody claiming they regularly use the internet with JS disabled is just lying for some sort of feel of superiority. You can read the Tor Browser design documentation (though old) to get a rough sketch of what it's trying-and what it's not trying-to achieve: įurther reading in case you think VPNs are the solution.

IS TOR PORN SAFER FULL

If you're not using the Tor Browser you're making yourself both insecure (it ships with a smaller attack surface, no WebGL for example) and fingerprintable defeating thus the full privacy advantages of the Tor Browser. > I'm ambivalent about Tor, but if you're using Tor, don't use the Browser Bundle.įirst off, the 'Tor Browser Bundle' is a deprecated name. The overwhelming majority of exit traffic now is using HTTPS and Tor Browser ships with HTTPS Everywhere to avoid SSL Striping attacks (in fact the next version of the Tor Browser will have the HTTPS-Only mode enabled by default, it's already being tested in the alpha release), so how will those evil exit node burn those exploits? > Meanwhile, the fork you'll be running is specifically designed to hide sensitive traffic, and collapses all those users into a single version for exploits to target. That might've been true in the past, it's hard to argue for it now. > Firefox is already not one of the most hardened browser engines.

Tor Browser ships updates as soon as new ESR versions come out. > A reminder that Tor Browser might be one of the least safe browsers you can run: it's a fork of Firefox, meaning that its maintainers have to coordinate and port patches from the mainline project. This is deeply misleading and based on old data.

Is tor porn safer